Legal Opinion

Augir v. Foresman

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1900No. 3620PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County. — Hon. E. D. Benson, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

White, J.

This was an action brought by appellant against respondent on October 5, 1899, on a promissory note due October 19, 1899. An affidavit for a writ of attachment was filed in the action, under § 290, 2 Hill’s Code, which provides that an action may be commenced and the property of a debtor may be attached previous to the time, when the debt becomes due, when nothing but time is wanting to fix an absolute indebtedness, and when the affidavit, in addition to that fact, states certain grounds, *596—among others, that the defendant is ahont to dispose…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cox v. ReinhardtTexas Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Pierce v. MyersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  3. Cox v. DawsonWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Gowan v. HansonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Wingo, Ellett & Crump v. Purdy & Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1891

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Keeler v. ParksWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. White v. MillionWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Adams v. Trepanier Lumber Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Johnson v. MuenzWashington Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API