Pierce v. Myers
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Clay District Court. May 7,1881, D. H. Myers and another, partners as Myers & Campbell, as plaintiffs recovered a judgment against defendant Pierce, who brings the case here. The facts appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:
This was an action commenced under §§ 230 to 236 of the civil code, on a promissory note, before it was due. An order of attachment was issued in the case by authority of the judge of the court, and levied upon certain property. Afterward, the defendant, Arthur S. Pierce, moved to set aside the order of attachment and. to discharge the property attached, on the grounds —“First, because no sufficient affidavit for attachment has ever been made in said action; second, because the pretended facts stated and set forth in the pretended…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lownsberry v. RakestrawSupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
- Grier v. FoxMissouri Court of Appeals · 1877
- Karr v. HudsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1878
- Seidentopf v. AnnabilNebraska Supreme Court · 1877
- Wadsworth v. CheenySupreme Court of Iowa · 1859
3Cited by12 opinions
- City of Eureka v. MerrifieldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894
- Brown v. CairnsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
- Dayton Spice-Mills Co. v. SloanNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
- Voorhis v. MichaelisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
- E. S. Jaffray & Co. v. Wolf & SonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1893
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.