Johnson v. Muenz
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the superior court for King county, Mackintosh, J., entered January 11, 1913, overruling a demurrer to the complaint and refusing to dissolve an attachment, in an action on contract.
1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.
Plairitiif brought this action against defendant to recover upon an immature debt, and sued out a writ of attachment.
The complaint does not state any of the facts necessary to be shown under Rem. & Bal. Code, § 649 (P. C. 81 § 417). The affidavit for the attachment was in proper form, alleging that the defendant was about to remove from the state, that he refused to make any arrangement for securing the payment of the debt when it falls due, and that such contemplated removal was not known to the plaintiff at the time the debt was contracted.
Defendant demurred to the complaint upon the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cox v. DawsonWashington Supreme Court · 1891
- Augir v. ForesmanWashington Supreme Court · 1900
- Carstens v. MiloWashington Supreme Court · 1905
- Belding v. Washington Cornice Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905