Legal Opinion

Gowan v. Hanson

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 1882PublishedCited by 11 opinions

APPEAL from the County Court of Milwaukee County. The case is stated in the opinion. The plaintiffs appealed from a judgment, that the “ complaint herein be and hereby is dismissed, and that they take nothing thereby,” etc.

Read the full summary

APPEAL from the County Court of Milwaukee County. The case is stated in the opinion. The plaintiffs appealed from a judgment, that the “ complaint herein be and hereby is dismissed, and that they take nothing thereby,” etc. They contended, inter alia: 1. Under sec. 2131, R. S., as amended by ch. 233, Laws of 1880, an action on a debt before maturity can be maintained against a debtor guilty of the fraudulent acts specified, and garnishee actions maintained against parties indebted to him, where no writ of attachment has been issued. The broad, general words of the statute should receive a…

1Opinion of the Court

Cole, O. J.

This action was commenced by attachment on a debt before maturity, and garnishee proceedings instituted. The ground'for the attachment, as stated in the affidavit made by one of the plaintiffs, was that the affiant had good reason to believe, and verily did believe, that the defendant had assigned, conveyed, disposed of, or concealed, or was about to assign, convey, dispose of, or conceal, his property with intent to defraud his creditors. The amount of debts to become due was stated in the affidavit to be $540.18. An undertaking in only the sum of $750 was executed. The…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Boyle v. Northwestern Mutual Relief Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Hubbard v. HaleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Dayton Spice-Mills Co. v. SloanNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Ross v. StockwellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
  5. Streissguth v. ReigelmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1889

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API