Legal Opinion

United States v. Crotchett

Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided May 12, 2009No. NMCCA 200800770PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PUBLISHED OPINION OF THE COURT

BOOKER, Judge:

In United States v. Neal, 67 M.J. 675 (N.M.Ct.Crim.App.2009), which presented a challenge of first impression to the revised Article 120, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 920, we granted a Government appeal and reversed the trial court’s ruling that the combination of Article 120(e) and Article 120(r) and (t), UCMJ, denied accused service members due process.

Today we are faced with another due-process challenge to the statute. Under Article 62, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 862, the United States has appealed the trial judge’s ruling that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. United States v. RainesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Barrows v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Martin v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. MedinaNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2009
  2. United States v. MedinaNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2009
  3. United States v. MedinaNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2009
  4. United States v. MedinaNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API