United States v. Medina
Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBeal, Judge
Notwithstanding this court’s recent precedent,1 I respectfully dissent from the majority’s handling of the facial and as-applied challenge to the aggravated sexual assault charge; as to the remaining assigned errors, I concur. I cannot in good conscience affirm a conviction of aggravated sexual assault under Article 120(c)(2), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 920(c)(2), because I am convinced that the statutory scheme of Article 120, in regard to that particular offense, is facially unconstitutional under the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. Under the express mandates…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.