Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Medina

Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided December 17, 2009No. NMCCA 200900053Published

1ConcurrenceMaksym, Judge

While I concur with the majority’s ultimate holding in this matter, I am compelled to write separately so as to set forth my view that the trial judge did not err by applying the Benehbook1 instruction on the issue of consent in an obvious effort to salvage this poorly written, confusing and arguably absurdly structured and articulated act of Congress. Article 120, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 920.

Here, the trial judge confronted a statute which has confounded the military justice community since its adoption and used a legitimate weapon placed at his disposal, the Military…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. United States v. MasonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
  3. United States v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2007
  4. United States v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004
  5. United States v. BrooksCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API