Legal Opinion

People v. Furgerson

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 8, 1962No. Crim. 1731PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoughlin, J.

The defendant was charged with the offense of arson, as defined by section 448a of the Penal Code, and of burning insured property with intent to defraud the insurer thereof, i.e., a violation of section 450a of the Penal Code; was tried by a jury; was convicted of both offenses; was placed on probation; moved for a new trial, which was denied; and appeals from the judgment of conviction and the order denying his motion for a new trial. Such an order is not appealable and the attempted appeal therefrom should be dismissed. (Pen. Code, § 1237.)

The claimed grounds for reversal are:

1. That the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. GouldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. People v. GouldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. People v. DarbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. People v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. Fomco, Inc. v. Joe Maggio, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1961

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Terpstra v. Niagara Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
  2. Rutledge v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
  3. People v. MalerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. Hawks v. Northwestern Mutual Insurance Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1969
  5. People v. FosterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API