Legal Opinion

People v. Maler

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 3, 1972No. Crim. 19667PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

STEPHENS, Acting P. J.

By information, defendant was charged in count I with arson (Pen. Code, § 448a), and in count II, with burning insured property with the intent to defraud an insurer (Pen. Code, § 548). Defendant pleaded not guilty, and his opening motion for dismissal was denied. The jury found defendant guilty on count I, and not guilty on count II. Defendant’s motion for new trial was denied; proceedings were suspended, and defendant was granted five years’ probation. Defendant appeals from the order granting probation.

At trial, it was established that defendant was part owner…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. BeagleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. People v. ReillyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. People v. PennyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. People v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. People v. MurrayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. People v. VillarrealCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  3. People v. RanceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  4. People v. PetersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  5. People v. FosterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API