Legal Opinion

Sprigg v. Barber

California Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1897No. L. A. No. 311PublishedCited by 7 opinions

MOTION in the Supreme Court for an order directing the Superior Court of San Diego County to set aside a settlement of a statement of the case, and to amend the same: E. S. Torrance, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Fleet, J.

This is a motion by appellant for an order directing the superior court, in which the action was tried, to entertain and hear a motion to vacate and set aside a certificate of allowance and settlement made by the judge of said court on the eleventh day of September, 1896, of a statement on appeal in said action, and to amend such statement by inserting therein and adding thereto certain matter inadvertently omitted by appellant in the statement as proposed by him and settled by the judge.

On June 26, 1897, some nine months after the date of the settlement of said statement, and after the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Flynn v. CottleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Branger & Driard v. ChevalierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. McMahon v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Watts v. Billings Bench Water Assn.Montana Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Pardo v. PardoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1913
  4. Seney v. Pickwick Stages Northern Division, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. Fajardo Sugar Co. v. SantiagoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API