Legal Opinion

General Data Corp. v. Porterfield

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1970No. 69-524PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, J.

The facts are not in dispute, and the principles of law surfacing for consideration are not obscure. An examination of the law and the facts raises the following questions.

I

Is the tax sought to he assessed by the Tax Commissioner levied on activity in interstate commerce?

Section 5741.02, Revised Code, which provides fox-levy of a use tax, reads in pertinent part: “(A) * * * an excise tax is hereby levied on the storage, use, or other consumption in this state of tangible personal property * * Section 5741.02(C) (2) then excepts certain purchases from taxation. The word “purchased” as used in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McGoldrick v. Berwind-White Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Southern Pacific Co. v. GallagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. GallagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Mead Corp. v. GlanderOhio Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Jewel Companies v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1970

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Quotron Systems, Inc. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Bunker-Ramo Corp. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Reinhardt Vending Co. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Union Central Life Insurance v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Bunker-Ramo Corp. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API