Quotron Systems, Inc. v. Limbach
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
R.C. 5739.01 and 5739.02 tax sales of automatic data processing (“adp”) and computer services, and R.C. 5741.02 imposes a complementary use tax “ * * * on the storage, use, or other consumption in this state of tangible personal property or the benefit realized in this state of any service provided. * * * ” R.C. 5741.01(N) defines “other consumption” as “ * * * including] receiving the benefits of a service by the person who purchased the service.” Thus, the purchase of adp and computer services is subject to the use tax.
R.C. 5739.01(Y) defined “automatic data processing and computer…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Goldberg v. SweetSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- D. H. Holmes Co., Ltd. v. McNamaraSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- National Geographic Society v. California Board of EqualizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- General Data Corp. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1970
3Cited by13 opinions
- PPG Industries, Inc. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Marc Glassman, Inc. v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- International Thomson Publishing, Inc. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- MIB, Inc. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Big Boy's Toy, Ltd. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.