State v. Yocum
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtSercombe, J.
Following pleas of no contest, defendant was convicted of four counts of first-degree burglary, ORS 164.225. The trial court ordered him to pay restitution to the victim in the amount of $18,000, which the trial court found represented the replacement cost of the victim’s stolen pair of diamond earrings. Defendant contends that the trial court erred in imposing restitution in that amount because there was insufficient evidence regarding the value of the diamond earrings. On review for errors of law, State v. Ferrara, 218 Or App 57, 67-68, 178 P3d 250, rev den, 344 Or 539 (2008), and for…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. EdsonOregon Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. HarringtonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- DeVaux v. PresbyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- State v. TippettsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- State v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. ONISHCHENKOCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- State v. PoolCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
- State v. IslamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- State v. Plagmann/SamoraCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- State v. PoolCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.