Legal Opinion
Parks v. Cooper
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided February 25, 2004No. NonePublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KONENKAMP, Justice.
[¶ 1.] The dispute in this appeal centers on three bodies of water located in Day and Clark counties in South Dakota, known as Long Lake, Parks Slough, and Schiley Slough. Because of unseasonably wet years, the water has accumulated into large lakes. They have attracted the interest of the public looking for sporting and recreational opportunities. Landowners with property interests in one or more of these three areas sought a declaratory judgment on their property rights and an injunction against the State and the public from using these lakes. In deciding in favor of the…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- The Daniel BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Illinois Central Railroad v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Pollard's Lessee v. HAGANSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
- Martin v. Lessee of WaddellSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
- United States v. Holt State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Hansen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Gloe v. Union Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Gloe v. Iowa Mutual Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Dan Nelson, Automotive, Inc. v. VikenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Kanuk Ex Rel. Kanuk v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.