Legal Opinion

Brown v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 26, 1914No. 3205PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

HABPEB, Judge.

Appellant was convicted under the following indictment, omitting formal parts: “did then and there unlawfully sell, furnish and give cocaine and morphine to M. E. Maddox, the said cocaine and morphine not then and there being sold, furnished and given by the said M. A. Brown upon the original written order or prescription of a lawfully authorized practitioner of medicine, dentistry or veterinary medicine.”

The only error relied on is that the court erred in overruling the motion to quash the indictment. The motion alleges that the indictment is defective because it is not charged…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Slack v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
  3. Chapman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897
  4. Wade v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Anderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1936
  2. Lowery v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1916
  3. Fyke v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1916
  4. Quaternick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1918
  5. Winterman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API