Legal Opinion

Quaternick v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 5, 1918No. 4921PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

MORROW, Judge.

—The conviction is for selling and exposing for sale adulterated milk, the adulteration consisting in adding water to the milk. The statute defining the offense is article 706, P. C., declaring it unlawful for any person to sell or expose for sale adulterated or impure milk. The article contains a proviso, stating that “skimmed milk” may be sold if on the can or package from which it is taken the words “skimmed milk” are painted.

Appellant attacks the sufficiency of the information upon the ground that there is no negative allegation showing that the sale was not a sale of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914
  2. Drechsel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
  3. Wilkerson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1903

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ex Parte G.H. VaughnCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  2. Ex parte VaughanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API