Legal Opinion

Fyke v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 15, 1916No. 3980PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Judge.

The indictment charges appellant, under article 748 of the Penal Code, with being then and there a lawfully-authorized practitioner of medicine, and, as such, did then and there unlawfully prescribe morphine for the use of Maud Smith, who was then and there an habitual user of morphine, contrary to the statutes, etc. That article provides that it shall be unlawful for any practitioner of medicine, dentistry or veterinary medicine to furnish to, or prescribe for the úse of, any habitual user of the same, any cocaine or morphine, or any salts or compound of cocaine or morphine,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914
  2. Blair v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1906

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Albitez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1970
  2. Lowery v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API