Siebert v. Smith
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Coleman, C. J.:
This is an action to recover judgment in the sum of $650. The complaint contains two causes of action. The first cause of action is upon an alleged breach of contract. The second cause of action is on quantum meruit for services rendered. The defendant demurred to the two causes of action separately and to the complaint as a whole, urging as to the first cause of action that the contract alleged was too indefinite and uncertain to be enforceable, and hence it failed to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.
The court sustained the demurrer to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Vickery v. RitchieMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- W., B. A.R.R. Co. v. MossCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1915
- Lapham v. OsborneNevada Supreme Court · 1888
- Harwood v. CarterNevada Supreme Court · 1924
3Cited by2 opinions
- Florey v. SinkeyNevada Supreme Court · 1961
- Al Colyer v. Lahontan Mines Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1933