Evans v. Hartmann
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJeffers, J.
This action was instituted by Dorothy Evans and Orville Evans, her husband, against Rudolf Hartmann and wife, to recover wages from January 1, 1938, to March 8, 1939, claimed to have been earned by Dorothy Evans, as an apartment house employee, under the provisions of the minimum wage law for women (Rem. Rev. Stat., §§ 7623 to 7641 [P. C. §§ 3526 to 3547], both inclusive), particularly § 7638 [P. C. § 3544], which provides:
“If any employee shall receive less than the legal minimum wage, except as hereinbefore provided in section 7632, said employee shall be entitled to recover in a civil…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gensman v. West Coast Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1940
- Warner v. KeeblerWashington Supreme Court · 1939
- Strom v. ToklasWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Jones, Rosquist, Killen Co. v. NelsonWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- Sparks v. MoritzWashington Supreme Court · 1926
3Cited by7 opinions
- Tutewiler v. ShannonWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Winston v. BaconWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Hynes v. HynesWashington Supreme Court · 1947
- Olsen v. John Hamrick's Tacoma TheatresWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Tepel v. SimaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.