Legal Opinion

McCoy v. Moore

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 23, 1939No. 28654PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELCH, V. C. J.

This appeal presents the sole question, whether Moore was the proper party plaintiff.

Moore sued to recover damages resulting to his automobile from a collision with one driven by the defendant, McCoy. At the time of collision the Moore automobile was being driven by one Haines to whom it had been delivered for servicing. The damage to Moore’s automobile had been repaired at Haines’ expense and Moore had agreed with him that he would bring the suit for damages or that suit would be brought in Moore’s name and that any recovery would inure to Haines’ benefit to reimburse him for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kansas City, M. & O. Ry. Co. v. ShuttSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Black v. DonelsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  3. Schaff v. CoyleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. Chickasaw Lumber Co. v. KunkelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Parkhill Truck Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  2. American Fidelity & Casualty Co., Inc. v. All American Bus Lines, IncCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
  3. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Associates Transports, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
  4. Momand v. Twentieth-Century Fox Film CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1941
  5. CINCINNATI, NO &C. R. CO. v. HilleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API