Legal Opinion

Dinwiddie v. St. Louis & O'Fallon Coal Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided April 4, 1933No. 3341PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NORTHCOTT, Circuit Judge.

This is a suit in equity brought' in the District Court of the United States for the District of Maryland, to determine plaintiff’s right to certain inventions made by Cuno and Bashioum, two of the appellants. There were four suits originally brought, one in the District of Maryland, against the appellant Dinwiddie; one in Missouri, against appellant Cuno; another in Pittsburgh, against appellant Bashioum; and the fourth in Delaware, against the appellant Bashioum Producer Retort Company, a corporation. By agreement Cuno, Bashioum, and the Bashioum Company appeared in…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Solomons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Dalzell v. Dueber Watch Case Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Standard Parts Co. v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. Hapgood v. HewittSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  5. Gill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Scutt v. BassettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  2. Crown Cork & Seal Co. v. FankhanelDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1943
  3. Marshall v. Colgate-Palmolive-Peet Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1948
  4. Gilson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1984
  5. Opinion No. 70-224 (1970) Ag, Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API