Legal Opinion
Crown Cork & Seal Co. v. Fankhanel
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided March 24, 1943No. Civ. 1815PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM C. COLEMAN, District Judge.
This is a suit to compel the defendant to execute an application for a patent covering an invention which' he made for a substitute for rubber sealing compounds for use in caps on bottles, etc., while employed in the research department of the plaintiff company; and to compel the defendant to assign the invention and his application for a patent to the plaintiff company.
The jurisdictional requisites with respect to diversity of citizenship and amount in controversy are satisfied.
Summarized, we find the material facts as disclosed by the evidence in the case…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- United States v. Dubilier Condenser CorpSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Solomons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- McCLURG v. KINGSLANDSupreme Court of the United States · 1843
- Dalzell v. Dueber Watch Case Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Standard Parts Co. v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hirshhorn v. Mine Safety Appliances Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1948
- Daniel Orifice Fitting Co. v. WhalenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Mainland Industries, Inc. v. Timberland MacHines & Engineering Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- Parfrey v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1983