Scutt v. Bassett
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
From a judgment in favor of plaintiff after a trial before the court without a jury in an action for damages (a) for conversion, (b) for unfair competition, and (c) to enjoin defendant from making automobile cranes or engine stands which are of the same construction as those heretofore manufactured under a contract by defendant for plaintiff, defendant appeals.
The evidence being viewed in the light most favorable to plaintiff (respondent), the essential facts are these:
Prior to March, 1945, plaintiff was a salesman for the Stuart Manufacturing Company, a manufacturer of automobile cranes. In…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. Raladam Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Standard Parts Co. v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Houghton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1928
- Wireless Specialty Apparatus Co. v. Mica Condenser Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Teledyne Industries, Inc. v. Eon CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974
- Schwartz v. Slenderella Systems of California, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1954
- Pope v. National Aero Finance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1965
- Schwartz v. Slenderella Systems of Calif.California Supreme Court · 1954
- R. A. Weaver & Associates, Inc. v. Haas & Haynie Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.