Legal Opinion

Rinsley v. Frydman

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 22, 1977No. 48,104PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Schroeder, J.:

This is an appeal by Donald B. Rinsley (plaintiff-appellant) from the trial court’s dismissal of an notion for failure to state a claim pursuant to K. S. A. 60-212 (b) (6) of his amended petition, which seeks to allege defamation and invasion of privacy against Louis Frydman (defendant-appellee) who allegedly made false statements about the plaintiff.

The appellant raises three points on appeal. He contends (1) the case should have been considered under our summary judgment statute, K. S. A. 60-256; (2) he is not a high public official…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Malone v. University of Kansas Medical CenterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  4. Froelich v. AdairSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  5. Schulze v. CoykendallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. City of SawyerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  2. Nelson v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  3. McCormack v. Oklahoma Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  4. OMI Holdings, Inc. v. HowellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
  5. Newcomb v. IngleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API