Legal Opinion

McCormack v. Oklahoma Publishing Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 24, 1980No. 52564PublishedCited by 117 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOOLIN, Justice:

By court decision, Oklahoma already recognizes a limited cause of action in tort founded on invasion of privacy. Munley v. ISC Financial House, Inc., 584 P.2d 1336 (Okl.1978) applied the Restatement of the Law of Torts § 652, its standards and definitions, to an action based on creditor harassment. In addition 21 O.S.1971 § 839.1 prohibits appropriation for one’s own benefit of another’s name or likeness and makes such appropriation a misdemean- or. Section 839.2 provides a cause of action for damages resulting from the appropriation. 1

In the present case a different form of…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Hurtado v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. CohnSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Christian v. American Home Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
  4. Carpenters & Joiners Union, Local No. 213 v. Ritter's CafeSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. Norman Birnbaum, B. Leonard Avery and Mary Rule MacMillen Plaintiffs v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by117 opinions

  1. Crump v. Beckley Newspapers, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Anderson v. SuitersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  3. Tate v. Browning-Ferris, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  4. Goodrich v. Waterbury Republican-American, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  5. Peterson v. GrishamCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010

112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API