Legal Opinion
Froelich v. Adair
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided December 8, 1973No. 46,992PublishedCited by 71 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Owsley, J.:
Plaintiff William Froelich appeals from judgment of the trial court denying him recovery for his mental suffering due to an alleged invasion of his privacy by defendant Burneta Adair.
Plaintiff’s cause of action for invasion of privacy by intrusion arose sometime in October, 1969, while he was a patient at St. Francis Hospital in Wichita. Burneta Adair’s former husband, Tom Hamilton, had previously sued her seeking to recover a million dollars for defamation because she had stated he was homosexual and William Froelich was his lover. Truth is…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- A. A. Dietemann v. Time, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- Munsell v. Ideal Food StoresSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
- Duffin v. PatrickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
- Kunz v. AllenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
- Johnson v. Boeing Airplane Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1953
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- Crump v. Beckley Newspapers, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
- Goodrich v. Waterbury Republican-American, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Godbehere v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1989
- Dawson v. Associates Financial Services Co. of Kansas, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1974
- Donald B. Rinsley, M.D. v. Anthony Brandt and William Morrow and Company, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.