Legal Opinion
Cinema Patents Co. v. Columbia Pictures Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 19, 1932No. 6852PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAVANAH, District Judge:
This is a suit charging defendants with. infringement of two patents- covering appa*311ratus for processing picture film. The charge is particularly directed to the altering by defendants of a machine owned by the plaintiff. The machines were leased to and placed in operation in the Wm. Horsley Film Laboratories, Inc., in Hollywood, under a lease agreement, which subsequently plaintiff acquired ownership of and of the patents therein named. A suit is now pending in the. Superior Court of California for an accounting to plaintiff for all photographic film developed,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Leeds & Catlin Company v. Victor Talking Machine Company (No. 2)Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Leeds & Catlin Co. v. Victor Talking Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1907
- Miller Hatcheries, Inc. v. Buckeye Incubator Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
- George Close Co. v. Ideal Wrapping MacH. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1928
- St. Louis Street Flushing Mach. Co. v. Sanitary Street Flushing Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910
3Cited by5 opinions
- Frederick B. Stevens, Inc. v. Steel & Tubes, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940
- Paul v. NauskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1964
- Hold Stitch Fabric MacH. Co. v. May Hosiery MillsTennessee Supreme Court · 1946
- Leuschner v. KutherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Leuschner v. KutherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963