Legal Opinion

George Close Co. v. Ideal Wrapping MacH. Co.

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided November 27, 1928No. 2286PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.

In this patent-infringement suit, no question is made as to the validity of the patents nor as to the acts of the defendant relied upon as infringement. The single question is whether those acts constitute infringement.

The patents cover two elaborate combination machines, both issued December 23, 1913, so successful as to be practically a necessity in the candy-manufacturing business. No. 1,082,331, with 89 claims, covers a candy-eutting machine; No. 1,082,463, a wrapping machine, with 119 claims. Ten claims in each patent are alleged to be infringed.

The present…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Motion Picture Patents Co. v. Universal Film Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. Henry v. A. B. Dick Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. Morgan Envelope Co. v. Albany Perforated Wrapping Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. Wilson v. SimpsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1850

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Baker-Cammack Hosiery Mills, Inc. v. Davis Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1950
  2. Miller Hatcheries, Inc. v. Buckeye Incubator Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
  3. American Patents Development Corp. v. Carbice Corp. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
  4. Cinema Patents Co. v. Columbia Pictures Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
  5. Green v. Rocket Research Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API