Hold Stitch Fabric MacH. Co. v. May Hosiery Mills
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chambliss
This is an appeal from a decree of the Chancery Court of Davidson County overruling a demurrer of defendant May Hosiery Mills to the hill filed by Hold ¡Stitch Fabric Machine Company, both Tennessee corporations, which challenged the jurisdiction, of the state court on the ground that the federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction of the issues involved. The question is one of first impression in this state.
The bill alleges:
1. That complainant is the assignee of one Clarence W. Minton to certain patent rights involving improvements in knitting machines and is entitled to the exclusive use of…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- The Fair v. Kohler Die & Specialty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Pratt v. Paris Gas Light & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Littlefield v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- General Electric Co. v. Marvel Rare Metals Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Luckett v. Delpark, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Jamie Hamilton v. Gary CookCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
- Minor Miracle Productions, LLC v. Randy StarkeyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2012