Leeds & Catlin Co. v. Victor Talking Mach. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
1Opinion of the Court
HOUGH, District Judge.
Defendants in error, having brought suit against the plaintiff in error alleging infringement of the Berliner Gramaphone patent (No. 534,543), procured an injunction restraining the manufacture, use, or sale of sound reproducing apparatus or devices embodying .the subject-matter specified in claims 5 and 35 of said patent, and also the use or employment in any way of the method set forth in claim 5 thereof (reported [C. C.] 146 Fed. 534, affirmed by this court 148 Fed. 1022). The claims protected by such adjudications are “a sound reproducing apparatus-consisting of (1)…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Morgan Envelope Co. v. Albany Perforated Wrapping Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Heaton-Peninsular Button-Fastener Co. v. Eureka Specialty Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
- Chaffee v. Boston Belting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1859
- Thomson-Houston Electric Co. v. Kelsey Electric Railway Specialty Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1896
- Cortelyou v. LoweCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1901
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Fromberg, Inc. v. Jack W. ThornhillCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- New York Scaffolding Co. v. WhitneyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
- Harvey Hubbell, Inc. v. General Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
- Winchester Repeating Arms Co. v. OlmstedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1913
- Connecticut Telephone & Electric Co. v. Automotive Equipment Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1926
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.