Legal Opinion

State v. Sutton

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee

Decided January 18, 1984PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TATUM, Judge.

This is an appeal pursuant to Rule 9, Tennessee Rules of Appellate Procedure, from the denial of pretrial diversion. The appellant, John H. Sutton, was indicted for unlawfully concealing a stolen automobile valued at over $200 and of violating T.C.A. § 55-5-112, by altering the serial number on the same automobile. The appellant applied to the District Attorney General for diversion of these two cases and the application was denied. The Criminal Court found that the District Attorney General did not abuse his discretion and affirmed the denial of diversion. On this appeal,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. HammersleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. PoplarCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1980
  3. Powers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1978
  4. State v. KingCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1982
  5. Blackwell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1980

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. CarrCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1993
  2. State v. MarkhamCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1988
  3. State v. LaneCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  4. State v. LutryCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1996
  5. State v. KyteCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1993

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API