Legal Opinion

State v. Poplar

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee

Decided December 18, 1980PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TATUM, Judge.

This is a Rule 9 (Tennessee Rules of Appellate Procedure) appeal from a judgment of the Criminal Court that affirmed the refusal of the District Attorney General to allow pre-trial diversion.

The District Attorney General filed a written assignment of his reasons for declining to enter into memoranda of understanding or to divert prosecution of the defendants. He admits that neither defendant has previous criminal convictions but states, in substance, that the defendants have not shown any overriding reasons as to why they should receive preferred treatment. He states that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dearborne v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State v. WatkinsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1980
  3. Frazier v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1977

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State v. HammersleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. CarrCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1993
  3. State v. MarkhamCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1988
  4. State v. HollandCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1983
  5. State v. SuttonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1984

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API