Legal Opinion

Blackwell v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee

Decided June 19, 1980PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAUGHTREY, Judge.

The appellant-defendant, Virgil Blackwell, was indicted for driving under the influence of an intoxicant (D.U.I.), first offense, and sought participation in a pre-trial diversion program under T.C.A. § 40-2108. The district attorney refused to enter a memorandum of understanding on the grounds that the statute is unconstitutional, that there are no facilities for diversion in his circuit, that the diversion statute is inapplicable to the D.U.I. statute because the latter statute contains a recidivist provision, and, finally, because he personally disagreed with the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dearborne v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Pace v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Moten v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Mattino v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1976
  5. Franks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1976

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. HammersleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. SuttonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1984
  3. State v. BaxterCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1993
  4. State v. KingCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1982
  5. Daniels v. City of AlcoaDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API