Legal Opinion
Arakaki v. Apoliona
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 31, 2005No. 04-15306PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BYBEE, Circuit Judge.
In this case we are called on, yet again, to hear a challenge to state programs restricting benefits to “native Hawaiians” or “Hawaiians.” See, e.g., Carroll v. Nakatani, 342 F.3d 934 (9th Cir.2003); Arakaki v. Hawaii, 314 F.3d 1091 (9th Cir.2002); Han v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice, 45 F.3d 333 (9th Cir.1995) (per curiam); Price v. Akaka, 3 F.3d 1220 (9th Cir.1993); Price v. Hawaii, 764 F.2d 623 (9th Cir.1985); Hoohuli v. Ariyoshi, 741 F.2d 1169 (9th Cir.1984); Keaukaha-Panaewa Cmty. Ass’n v. Hawaiian Homes Comm’n, 588 F.2d 1216 (9th Cir.1978); see also Rice v. Cayetano, 528…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. CunoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Arakaki v. LingleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. CunoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Dewberry v. KulongoskiDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2005
- Freedom From Religion Foundation, Inc. v. GeithnerDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.