Legal Opinion
Dewberry v. Kulongoski
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided December 21, 2005No. Civ. 04-6175-AAPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
AIKEN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs filed suit against Governor Ku-longoski, other State of Oregon executives (State defendants or the State), and the Confederated Tribes of Coos, Lower Umpqua and Siuslaw Indians (the Tribes), seeking a declaration that a gaming compact (the Compact) between the State and the Tribes is “unconstitutional, illegal, null and void.” Complaint, ¶ 22. Plaintiffs allege that the Compact violates the prohibition against the establishment of casinos contained in the Oregon Constitution and was not lawfully executed by the Governor and thus permits…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Florida House of Representatives v. CristSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
- STATE EX REL. DEWBERRY v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- TREAT v. STITTSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
- Detroit International Bridge Company v. Government of CanadaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- State Ex Rel. Dewberry v. KulongoskiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.