Legal Opinion

Smith v. Rhodes

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 22, 1972No. 7228DC718PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRAHAM, Judge.

One of the findings of fact relied upon by the trial court to support a change in custody is “[t]hat the two minor children . . . now desire to live and reside with their mother, the defendant, and to visit with their father, the plaintiff, during vacation times.” There is no evidence in the record to. support this finding. Apparently it is based on information obtained during a private conversation which the trial judge had with one of the children, over plaintiff’s objection, and out of the presence of plaintiff and his counsel. Plaintiff’s first assignment of error…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Shepherd v. ShepherdSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Raper v. BerrierSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  3. Cook v. CookCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  4. Horton v. HortonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ynclan v. WoodwardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010
  2. Williams v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  3. Ynclan v. WoodwardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API