Cook v. Cook
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBeocK, J.
Plaintiff argues convincingly that the trial court committed reversible error in privately questioning the minor child over plain tiff’s objection and despite a specific request from plaintiff that any testimony taken from the child be taken in the presence of the parties. In a court proceeding all parties are entitled to be present at all of its stages so that they may hear the evidence and have an opportunity to refute it. N.C. Const. Art. I, § 35. Our Supreme Court has upheld this constitutional right in a custody proceeding. See Raper v. Berrier, 246 N.C. 193, 97 S.E. 2d 782, where the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Raper v. BerrierSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ex Parte BerryhillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
- Marshall v. StefanidesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- Gennarini v. GennariniConnecticut Appellate Court · 1984
- Matter of BarkleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- Smith v. RhodesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.