Legal Opinion

Ynclan v. Woodward

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 25, 2010No. 107,478PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAUGER, J.;:

[1 This is a case of first impression. We have never determined under what cireum-stances and conditions a trial court may: 1) conduct in camera1 interviews of children who are the subject of child custody and/or visitation proceedings;2 and 2) provide the transcript of the proceedings to the parents after the private in camera interview occurs. Consequently, we assume original jurisdiction to address these questions, and to delineate the guidelines for trial courts to follow when conducting an in camera interview of children in custody/visitation matters. We also hold that unless…

2Cases cited112 opinions

  1. Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Riverside Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Lincoln v. LincolnNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. In Re the Marriage of VrbanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  5. Harry R. Carlile Trust v. Cotton Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986

107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Foshee v. FosheeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010
  2. Helen S.K. v. Samuel M.K.Alaska Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Mullendore v. MullendoreCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2012
  4. STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. BAILEYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2023
  5. STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. BAILEYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2023

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API