Legal Opinion

Dyer v. Compere

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1937No. 4300PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SADLER, Justice.

The appellants (plaintiffs below) sued in equity to enjoin and restrain appellee from keeping and maintaining a gate crossing, a tamarisk hedge, and other claimed obstructions and encroachments on a certain right of way or easement for the use of appellants’ property located to the east and at the rear of appellee’s property.

Santiago Garcia and Candelaria Garcia, his wife, predecessors in title to both appellee, W. Gano Compere, and appellants, Clarence M. Dyer and Maude Dyer, his wife, were, prior to June 16, 1927, the owners of two tracts of real estate adjoining each other.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Tong v. FeldmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
  2. Hammond v. HammondSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  3. Fendall v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Doan v. AllgoodIllinois Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Dewire v. HanleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1907

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Big Cottonwood Tanner Ditch Co. v. MoyleUtah Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Martinez v. MartinezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Kennedy v. BondNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Brooks v. TannerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Grammas v. ColasurdoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API