Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Tanner

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1984No. 14933PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SOSA, Senior Justice.

Plaintiffs Jerry and Ruth Brooks appeal from a district court judgment granting Fermin and Cecilia Herrera (Herreras) the right to use a roadway easement across the Brooks’ property.

The issues are whether the provisions of a real estate contract created an express easement for road purposes, or whether a roadway easement was created by prescription or by necessity.

Reference to the following sketch which appears in the record as Plaintiffs’ Exhibit 8 will enhance understanding of the facts and issues presented herein.

[[Image here]]

Lewis R. Tanner, Sr. (Seller) was…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Shaeffer v. KeltonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Hester v. SawyersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Schultz & Lindsay Construction Co. v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Martinez v. MartinezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Posey v. DoveNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Herrera v. Roman Catholic ChurchNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. United States v. JenksCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  3. Skeen v. BoylesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Gallup Westside Development, LLC v. City of GallupNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Lopez v. AdamsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API