Brooks v. Tanner
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SOSA, Senior Justice.
Plaintiffs Jerry and Ruth Brooks appeal from a district court judgment granting Fermin and Cecilia Herrera (Herreras) the right to use a roadway easement across the Brooks’ property.
The issues are whether the provisions of a real estate contract created an express easement for road purposes, or whether a roadway easement was created by prescription or by necessity.
Reference to the following sketch which appears in the record as Plaintiffs’ Exhibit 8 will enhance understanding of the facts and issues presented herein.
[[Image here]]
Lewis R. Tanner, Sr. (Seller) was…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Shaeffer v. KeltonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
- Hester v. SawyersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
- Schultz & Lindsay Construction Co. v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972
- Martinez v. MartinezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1979
- Posey v. DoveNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Herrera v. Roman Catholic ChurchNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
- United States v. JenksCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Skeen v. BoylesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
- Gallup Westside Development, LLC v. City of GallupNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
- Lopez v. AdamsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.