Legal Opinion

Martinez v. Martinez

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1979No. 12256PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASLEY, Justice.

Appellant brought suit for declaratory relief and for damages involving a claimed easement for ingress and egress over appellee’s land. At the close of appellant’s case, the claim was dismissed by the trial court. We reverse and remand.

The question is whether appellant has an easement under the circumstances. He bases his claim on any of three alternative theories: by express grant, by implication, or by necessity.

Abutting tracts of land are owned by the parties to the suit. Both parties gained title to the southern portions of their tracts from their father some years…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hester v. SawyersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Kennedy v. BondNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Dyer v. CompereNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
  4. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. DanfelserNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Michelet v. ColeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1915

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Forge v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Boone v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Herrera v. Roman Catholic ChurchNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Roybal v. MorrisNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Skeen v. BoylesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API