Legal Opinion
Ferguson v. Union Pacific Railroad
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided November 5, 1999No. S-98-652PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStephan, J.
Scott Ferguson brought this action to recover compensation allegedly due him from his employer, Union Pacific Railroad Company (Union Pacific), for periods when he was on active duty with the U.S. Army Reserve. The district court for Lincoln County determined, as a matter of law, that Ferguson’s claim lacked merit and therefore entered summary judgment in favor of Union Pacific. Ferguson appealed, and we moved the appeal to our docket on our own motion. We find no error and therefore affirm.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Ferguson has been an employee of Union Pacific and a member of the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. v. NorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Chicago River & Indiana RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway v. BuellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Holste v. Burlington Northern RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Huff v. SwartzNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
- Smith v. Lincoln Meadows Homeowners Ass'nNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
- Manker v. MankerNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
- Callahan v. Washington National InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
- Capitol City Telephone, Inc. v. Nebraska Department of RevenueNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.