Legal Opinion

Jameison v. City of Paducah

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 30, 1922PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from McCracken Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

■Opinion op the Court by

Judge Sampson

Affirming.

This appeal presents the question of whether a written. contract made by one of the commissioners of the *72city of Paducah- -with, an architect for-plans' for a publiG building, by -which the architect was to receive five per cent of the estimated cost of the structure as compensation for his services, is valid and enforcible against the city. Paducah is a city of the second class, and is and was at all times mentioned in the pleadings in this action, operating .under a commission form of government, which consists of a mayor and four…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of Louisville v. ParsonsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  2. Floyd County v. Owego Bridge Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  3. House v. Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Worrell Manufacturing Co. v. City of AshlandCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  5. Trustees of Belleview v. HohnCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1884

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. American Airlines, Inc., Trans World Airlines, Inc., Eastern Air Lines, Inc. v. Louisville and Jefferson County Air BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1959
  2. Horne Zoological Arena Co. v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  3. Inland Waterways Co. v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  4. Booth v. City of OwensboroCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
  5. Davisworth v. City of LexingtonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API