Transit Authority of Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government v. Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 639 ex rel. Dickerson
Kentucky Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
VANCE, Justice.
The question is whether or not a clause in a collective bargaining agreement entered into between the Transit Authority of Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government and Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 639, which provides for binding interest arbitration is enforceable. Fayette Circuit Court held the contract enforceable and, upon motion, the appeal from the judgment was transferred to this court. We reverse the judgment.
The Transit Authority provides a variety of transportation services to the public, including local bus service. It was created pursuant to the provisions of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Rash v. Louisville & Jefferson County Metropolitan Sewer DistrictCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949
- Board of Trustees of Policemen's Pension Fund v. SchuppCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
- City of Covington v. District of HighlandsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1902
- Booth v. City of OwensboroCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
- Board of Park Com'rs of Ashland v. ShanklinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1947
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- City of Bethany v. Public Employees Relations BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- City of Louisa v. NewlandKentucky Supreme Court · 1986
- Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle v. Division 587, Amalgamated Transit UnionWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1996
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2006
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.