Legal Opinion

Arbulich v. Arbulich

California Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1953No. S. F. 18194PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

Following hearings on petitions to determine heirship in this estate the probate court found that on March 21, 1947, the date of death of the decedent (see Estate of Giordano (1948), 85 Cal.App.2d 588, 594 [193 P.2d 771]), the reciprocal inheritance rights prescribed by section 259 of the Probate Code did not exist between residents and citizens of this nation and those of Yugoslavia as to either real or personal property. Judgment was thereupon entered to the effect that decedent’s surviving brother Thomas (respondent herein), residing in and a citizen of the United States, is entitled to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Estate of SchluttigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. United States v. KnutzenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Estate of BevilacquaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Estate of GiordanoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. People v. McGrathCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Martinez v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
  2. City of Pleasant Hill v. First Baptist ChurchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  3. Estate of GogabashveleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  4. De Sauvage v. State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
  5. State Land Board v. BrownellOregon Supreme Court · 1953

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API