Gulart v. Azevedo
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Stanislaus County. L. W. Fulkerth, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The plaintiff was given judgment for $3,500, with interest thereon, alleged to be due as commissions for the sale of defendant's land. The defendant's motion for a new trial was denied and this appeal is from the judgment.
The court found that on the twenty-fourth day of May, 1919, the defendant executed and delivered to plaintiff a writing containing the following provisions: "I have this day placed with John Gulart for sale the property described on the reverse side of this card, of which I am the owner. The said John Gulart shall have the sole and exclusive agency of the property for nine…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ormsby v. GrahamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- Wiggins v. WilsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
- Moore v. GouldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Merriman v. WickershamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Bacon v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Henry S. Grinde Corporation v. KlindworthNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
- Lathrop v. GaugerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Moss v. WarnsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1944
- Born v. KoopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Rylee v. De FiniAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.