Legal Opinion

Glover v. Maddox

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 5, 1958No. 37319PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Quillian, Judge.

The defendant’s general demurrer is directed only against the second count of the petition which undertakes to set up the plaintiffs’ right to recover quantum meruit. “Lawyers jointly undertaking to represent a client without a contract as to the division of fees share equally.” 5 Am. Jur. 386, § 207. This is generally recognized and followed in most jurisdictions. We think it prevails in Georgia and must be applied in the instant casé.

When the evidence, direct or circumstantial, shows there was an express or implied contract among lawyers associated in the representation of a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sowell v. SowellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
  2. Greenwood v. StarrSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
  3. Bray v. PeaceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  4. Underwood v. OverstreetCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  5. Langdon v. KennedyNebraska Supreme Court · 1929

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Chambliss v. HallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  2. In Re JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Rucker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  4. Geter v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
  5. Canal Insurance Co. v. TateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API