Nielson v. Patterson
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McGREGOR, Vice Chief Justice.
¶ 1 We granted review to determine whether an appellee, in an appeal from an order granting the appellee a new trial, must file a protective cross-appeal if it wishes to preserve its ability to challenge the underlying judgment, in the event the appellate court overturns the order granting a new trial. We hold that an order granting a new trial vacates the original entry of judgment and that an appellee need not challenge the underlying judgment through a mandatory protective cross-appeal.
I
¶ 2 The Nielsons obtained a $2 million jury verdict against the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Hawkins v. Allstate InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1987
- Hutcherson v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1998
- Ohio Valley Trust Co. v. WernkeIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
- Di Pietruntonio v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1958
- Arizona-Parral Mining Co. v. ForbesArizona Supreme Court · 1915
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Cullen v. Auto-Owners InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 2008
- Falcon Ex Rel. Sandoval v. Maricopa CountyArizona Supreme Court · 2006
- Shotwell v. DonahoeArizona Supreme Court · 2004
- Turley v. EthingtonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- American Pepper Supply Co. v. Federal InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 2004
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.