Legal Opinion

Nielson v. Patterson

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 2003No. CV-02-0330-SAPublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McGREGOR, Vice Chief Justice.

¶ 1 We granted review to determine whether an appellee, in an appeal from an order granting the appellee a new trial, must file a protective cross-appeal if it wishes to preserve its ability to challenge the underlying judgment, in the event the appellate court overturns the order granting a new trial. We hold that an order granting a new trial vacates the original entry of judgment and that an appellee need not challenge the underlying judgment through a mandatory protective cross-appeal.

I

¶ 2 The Nielsons obtained a $2 million jury verdict against the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. Allstate InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Hutcherson v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Ohio Valley Trust Co. v. WernkeIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Di Pietruntonio v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Arizona-Parral Mining Co. v. ForbesArizona Supreme Court · 1915

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Cullen v. Auto-Owners InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Falcon Ex Rel. Sandoval v. Maricopa CountyArizona Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Shotwell v. DonahoeArizona Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Turley v. EthingtonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  5. American Pepper Supply Co. v. Federal InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 2004

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API