Jackson v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 7714 (T. D. 35331).
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, Presiding Judge
The merchandise here involved is granito, which is a manufacture of marble waste, crushed and screened, and was held; in the case of Rossman v. United States (1 Ct. Cust. Appls., 280; T. D. 31321), to be dutiable as a manufactured article. The present importation was made under the tariff act of 1913, and was assessed for duty at 20 per cent ad valorem under paragraph 81, and is claimed to be dutiable at 15 per cent ad valorem as an unenumerated manufactured article under paragraph 385.
The importers put forth two contentions: First, that the article granito was under the tariff act of 1909…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fensterer & Ruhe v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
- Dingelstedt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1898
- Rossman v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- United States v. Tamm & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
- United States v. General Electric Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- L. Oppleman, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1938