United States v. Tamm & Co.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 7235 (T. D. 31705).
1Opinion of the CourtBaRbek, Judge
The merchandise here involved, as represented by the official exhibit, is a solid piece of flint stone, circular in shape, having a diameter of a little more than 3 inches and a length of a little more *426than 2 inches. The periphery is polished. The ends have been smoothed but not polished. It is a glazing stone used for glazing papers, but the method of its use is not disclosed. It was assessed for duty under the provisions of paragraph 95 of the tariff act of 1909, the material part of which reads as follows:
95. Articles and wares composed wholly or in chief value of earthy or mineral…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Salomon v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. Stouffer Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
- Waddell v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
- United States v. Manufacturers' Paper Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
- Accurate Millinery Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
- Jackson v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.